Clinton, MD vs Waldorf, MD

Clinton is moderately more affordable than Waldorf, with a 5.6% lower cost of living index. Clinton scores 122 compared to 129 for Waldorf, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Waldorf can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $1,665/month compared to $1,949/month in Waldorf — a 15% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Clinton has cheaper rent, Waldorf actually has lower median home values ($383,100 vs $400,300).

Median household income in Clinton is $120,967 compared to $115,453 in Waldorf (+4.8%). Clinton offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 16.5% of their income on rent, less than the 20.3% in Waldorf.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (59.3°F vs 59.3°F). Waldorf receives more rainfall at 41.8" per year compared to 41.8" in Clinton.