Clinton, MD vs Urbana, MD

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Clinton is 26.4% cheaper than Urbana. With a cost index of 122 vs 165, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Clinton to Urbana should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $1,665/month compared to $2,571/month in Urbana — a 35% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Clinton is more affordable at $400,300 median vs $596,400.

Median household income in Clinton is $120,967 compared to $178,231 in Urbana (-32.1%). While Urbana is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 16.5% of their income on rent, less than the 17.3% in Urbana.

Climate-wise, Clinton is notably warmer with an average of 59.3°F compared to 55.7°F in Urbana. Urbana receives more rainfall at 43.2" per year compared to 41.8" in Clinton.