Clinton, MD vs Summerfield, MD

Clinton, MD and Summerfield, MD have a very similar cost of living, with only a 4.8% difference in their overall index. Clinton scores 122 while Summerfield scores 128 on the cost of living index, where 100 represents the national average. The day-to-day expenses for residents in both cities are comparable, though differences emerge when looking at specific categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $1,665/month compared to $2,032/month in Summerfield — a 18% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Clinton has cheaper rent, Summerfield actually has lower median home values ($339,800 vs $400,300).

Median household income in Clinton is $120,967 compared to $92,042 in Summerfield (+31.4%). Clinton offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 16.5% of their income on rent, less than the 26.5% in Summerfield.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (59.3°F vs 59.3°F). Summerfield receives more rainfall at 41.8" per year compared to 41.8" in Clinton.