Clinton, CT vs Wauregan, CT

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Wauregan is 17.2% cheaper than Clinton. With a cost index of 90 vs 106, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Wauregan to Clinton should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Clinton is $1,408/month compared to $1,175/month in Wauregan — a 20% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Wauregan is more affordable at $240,400 median vs $344,200.

Median household income in Clinton is $83,333 compared to $90,625 in Wauregan (-8%). Wauregan offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Clinton spend roughly 20.3% of their income on rent, more than the 15.6% in Wauregan.