Clayton, CA vs Rexland Acres, CA

The cost of living difference between Clayton, CA and Rexland Acres, CA is dramatic. Rexland Acres is 150.7% cheaper than Clayton, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Clayton has a cost index of 231 while Rexland Acres sits at 92, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Clayton is $3,501/month compared to $1,349/month in Rexland Acres — a 160% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Rexland Acres is more affordable at $186,300 median vs $1,017,300.

Median household income in Clayton is $172,226 compared to $54,491 in Rexland Acres (+216.1%). While Clayton is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Clayton spend roughly 24.4% of their income on rent, less than the 29.7% in Rexland Acres.