Clarendon, AR vs Kingsland, AR

Clarendon is moderately more affordable than Kingsland, with a 10.3% lower cost of living index. Clarendon scores 52 compared to 58 for Kingsland, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Kingsland can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Clarendon is $504/month compared to $804/month in Kingsland — a 37% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Clarendon has cheaper rent, Kingsland actually has lower median home values ($34,500 vs $72,400).

Median household income in Clarendon is $33,500 compared to $26,731 in Kingsland (+25.3%). Clarendon offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Clarendon spend roughly 18.1% of their income on rent, less than the 36.1% in Kingsland. The Clarendon ratio exceeds the commonly recommended 30% threshold, which can put pressure on household budgets.