Clancy, MT vs Lolo, MT

Lolo is moderately more affordable than Clancy, with a 6.5% lower cost of living index. Clancy scores 102 compared to 96 for Lolo, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Clancy can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Clancy is $1,109/month compared to $1,126/month in Lolo — a 2% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Clancy has cheaper rent, Lolo actually has lower median home values ($353,700 vs $443,500).

Median household income in Clancy is $116,800 compared to $73,700 in Lolo (+58.5%). While Clancy is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Clancy spend roughly 11.4% of their income on rent, less than the 18.3% in Lolo.