Cimarron Hills, CO vs Redlands, CO

Cimarron Hills is moderately more affordable than Redlands, with a 10.4% lower cost of living index. Cimarron Hills scores 105 compared to 118 for Redlands, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Redlands can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Cimarron Hills is $1,439/month compared to $1,546/month in Redlands — a 7% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Cimarron Hills is more affordable at $333,300 median vs $466,400.

Median household income in Cimarron Hills is $75,853 compared to $97,500 in Redlands (-22.2%). While Redlands is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Cimarron Hills spend roughly 22.8% of their income on rent, more than the 19% in Redlands.