Chula, MO vs Clarksville, MO

Chula is moderately more affordable than Clarksville, with a 5.8% lower cost of living index. Chula scores 56 compared to 59 for Clarksville, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Clarksville can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Chula is $583/month compared to $650/month in Clarksville — a 10% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Chula is more affordable at $75,500 median vs $92,500.

Median household income in Chula is $39,792 compared to $62,045 in Clarksville (-35.9%). While Clarksville is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Chula spend roughly 17.6% of their income on rent, more than the 12.6% in Clarksville.