Home / Compare / Chester vs Hinsdale

Chester, MT vs Hinsdale, MT

66
Chester
Montana
VS
+12.9%
58
Hinsdale
Montana

Hinsdale is moderately more affordable than Chester, with a 12.9% lower cost of living index. Chester scores 66 compared to 58 for Hinsdale, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Chester can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Chester is $662/month compared to $537/month in Hinsdale — a 23% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Hinsdale is more affordable at $111,800 median vs $156,900.

Median household income in Chester is $53,583 compared to $40,250 in Hinsdale (+33.1%). While Chester is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Chester spend roughly 14.8% of their income on rent, less than the 16% in Hinsdale.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Chester
66
Hinsdale
58
11% cheaper
Median Household Income
Chester
$53,583
25% higher
Hinsdale
$40,250

Housing

Median Rent
Chester
$662
Hinsdale
$537
19% cheaper
Median Home Value
Chester
$156,900
Hinsdale
$111,800
29% cheaper
Population
Chester
704
Hinsdale
250

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula: