Chaska, MN vs Rogers, MN

Chaska is moderately more affordable than Rogers, with a 6.9% lower cost of living index. Chaska scores 111 compared to 119 for Rogers, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Rogers can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Chaska is $1,436/month compared to $1,550/month in Rogers — a 7% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Chaska is more affordable at $379,400 median vs $437,900.

Median household income in Chaska is $110,000 compared to $159,638 in Rogers (-31.1%). While Rogers is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Chaska spend roughly 15.7% of their income on rent, more than the 11.7% in Rogers.