Cascade Valley, WA vs Clinton, WA

The cost of living difference between Cascade Valley, WA and Clinton, WA is dramatic. Cascade Valley is 36% cheaper than Clinton, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Cascade Valley has a cost index of 82 while Clinton sits at 128, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Cascade Valley is $1,192/month compared to $1,350/month in Clinton — a 12% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Cascade Valley is more affordable at $101,100 median vs $603,900.

Median household income in Cascade Valley is $48,862 compared to $72,135 in Clinton (-32.3%). The higher salaries in Clinton partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Cascade Valley spend roughly 29.3% of their income on rent, more than the 22.5% in Clinton.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (50.9°F vs 51.4°F). Clinton receives more rainfall at 33.4" per year compared to 7.8" in Cascade Valley.