Home / Compare / Callaway vs Rollingstone

Callaway, MN vs Rollingstone, MN

64
Callaway
Minnesota
VS
-12.3%
74
Rollingstone
Minnesota

Callaway is moderately more affordable than Rollingstone, with a 12.3% lower cost of living index. Callaway scores 64 compared to 74 for Rollingstone, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Rollingstone can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Callaway is $792/month compared to $729/month in Rollingstone — a 9% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Rollingstone has cheaper rent, Callaway actually has lower median home values ($83,300 vs $217,400).

Median household income in Callaway is $55,000 compared to $86,500 in Rollingstone (-36.4%). While Rollingstone is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Callaway spend roughly 17.3% of their income on rent, more than the 10.1% in Rollingstone.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Callaway
64
12% cheaper
Rollingstone
74
Median Household Income
Callaway
$55,000
Rollingstone
$86,500
36% higher

Housing

Median Rent
Callaway
$792
Rollingstone
$729
8% cheaper
Median Home Value
Callaway
$83,300
62% cheaper
Rollingstone
$217,400
Population
Callaway
197
Rollingstone
590

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula: