Calera, OK vs Clinton, OK

Clinton is moderately more affordable than Calera, with a 10.3% lower cost of living index. Calera scores 74 compared to 67 for Clinton, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Calera can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Calera is $991/month compared to $888/month in Clinton — a 12% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Clinton is more affordable at $112,500 median vs $159,500.

Median household income in Calera is $54,179 compared to $58,417 in Clinton (-7.3%). Clinton offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Calera spend roughly 21.9% of their income on rent, more than the 18.2% in Clinton.