Burns, WY vs Moorcroft, WY

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Moorcroft is 19.5% cheaper than Burns. With a cost index of 82 vs 98, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Moorcroft to Burns should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Burns is $1,639/month compared to $1,025/month in Moorcroft — a 60% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Moorcroft has cheaper rent, Burns actually has lower median home values ($198,500 vs $227,900).

Median household income in Burns is $49,851 compared to $66,176 in Moorcroft (-24.7%). Moorcroft offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Burns spend roughly 39.5% of their income on rent, more than the 18.6% in Moorcroft. The Moorcroft ratio exceeds the commonly recommended 30% threshold, which can put pressure on household budgets.