Home / Compare / Burns Flat vs Kingfisher

Burns Flat, OK vs Kingfisher, OK

65
Burns Flat
Oklahoma
VS
-16.6%
78
Kingfisher
Oklahoma

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Burns Flat is 16.6% cheaper than Kingfisher. With a cost index of 65 vs 78, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Burns Flat to Kingfisher should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Burns Flat is $817/month compared to $932/month in Kingfisher — a 12% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Burns Flat is more affordable at $105,100 median vs $219,400.

Median household income in Burns Flat is $41,974 compared to $66,000 in Kingfisher (-36.4%). While Kingfisher is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Burns Flat spend roughly 23.4% of their income on rent, more than the 16.9% in Kingfisher.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Burns Flat
65
17% cheaper
Kingfisher
78
Median Household Income
Burns Flat
$41,974
Kingfisher
$66,000
36% higher

Housing

Median Rent
Burns Flat
$817
12% cheaper
Kingfisher
$932
Median Home Value
Burns Flat
$105,100
52% cheaper
Kingfisher
$219,400
Population
Burns Flat
1,954
Kingfisher
4,964

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula: