Buffalo, MO vs Clinton, MO

Buffalo is moderately more affordable than Clinton, with a 6% lower cost of living index. Buffalo scores 62 compared to 66 for Clinton, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Clinton can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Buffalo is $647/month compared to $706/month in Clinton — a 8% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Buffalo is more affordable at $131,300 median vs $147,700.

Median household income in Buffalo is $32,630 compared to $50,852 in Clinton (-35.8%). While Clinton is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Buffalo spend roughly 23.8% of their income on rent, more than the 16.7% in Clinton.