Home / Compare / Brownsdale vs Garfield

Brownsdale, MN vs Garfield, MN

69
Brownsdale
Minnesota
VS
+12%
61
Garfield
Minnesota

Garfield is moderately more affordable than Brownsdale, with a 12% lower cost of living index. Brownsdale scores 69 compared to 61 for Garfield, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Brownsdale can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Brownsdale is $788/month compared to $477/month in Garfield — a 65% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Garfield has cheaper rent, Brownsdale actually has lower median home values ($137,600 vs $162,500).

Median household income in Brownsdale is $76,500 compared to $70,250 in Garfield (+8.9%). The higher salaries in Brownsdale partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Brownsdale spend roughly 12.4% of their income on rent, more than the 8.1% in Garfield.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Brownsdale
69
Garfield
61
11% cheaper
Median Household Income
Brownsdale
$76,500
8% higher
Garfield
$70,250

Housing

Median Rent
Brownsdale
$788
Garfield
$477
39% cheaper
Median Home Value
Brownsdale
$137,600
15% cheaper
Garfield
$162,500
Population
Brownsdale
860
Garfield
295

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula: