Bristol, WI vs Lake Ripley, WI

Lake Ripley is moderately more affordable than Bristol, with a 10.2% lower cost of living index. Bristol scores 96 compared to 87 for Lake Ripley, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Bristol can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Bristol is $1,213/month compared to $804/month in Lake Ripley — a 51% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Lake Ripley has cheaper rent, Bristol actually has lower median home values ($288,800 vs $351,300).

Median household income in Bristol is $109,917 compared to $115,516 in Lake Ripley (-4.8%). Lake Ripley offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Bristol spend roughly 13.2% of their income on rent, more than the 8.4% in Lake Ripley.