Bristol, VT vs Ludlow, VT

Ludlow is moderately more affordable than Bristol, with a 10.7% lower cost of living index. Bristol scores 99 compared to 89 for Ludlow, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Bristol can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Bristol is $1,290/month compared to $1,029/month in Ludlow — a 25% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Ludlow is more affordable at $278,300 median vs $298,200.

Median household income in Bristol is $71,372 compared to $53,654 in Ludlow (+33%). While Bristol is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Bristol spend roughly 21.7% of their income on rent, less than the 23% in Ludlow.