Bristol, TN vs Clinton, TN

Bristol is moderately more affordable than Clinton, with a 9.6% lower cost of living index. Bristol scores 68 compared to 75 for Clinton, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Clinton can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Bristol is $764/month compared to $858/month in Clinton — a 11% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Bristol is more affordable at $182,500 median vs $204,700.

Median household income in Bristol is $55,007 compared to $64,005 in Clinton (-14.1%). While Clinton is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Bristol spend roughly 16.7% of their income on rent, more than the 16.1% in Clinton.