Bristol, NH vs Lincoln, NH

Bristol, NH and Lincoln, NH have a very similar cost of living, with only a 0% difference in their overall index. Bristol scores 92 while Lincoln scores 92 on the cost of living index, where 100 represents the national average. The day-to-day expenses for residents in both cities are comparable, though differences emerge when looking at specific categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Bristol is $1,270/month compared to $1,025/month in Lincoln — a 24% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Lincoln has cheaper rent, Bristol actually has lower median home values ($192,900 vs $283,500).

Median household income in Bristol is $60,972 compared to $56,406 in Lincoln (+8.1%). Bristol offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Bristol spend roughly 25% of their income on rent, more than the 21.8% in Lincoln.

Climate-wise, Bristol is notably warmer with an average of 46°F compared to 42.6°F in Lincoln. Bristol receives more rainfall at 38.1" per year compared to 37" in Lincoln.