Home / Compare / Brent vs Chelsea

Brent, OK vs Chelsea, OK

71
Brent
Oklahoma
VS
+13.3%
63
Chelsea
Oklahoma

Chelsea is moderately more affordable than Brent, with a 13.3% lower cost of living index. Brent scores 71 compared to 63 for Chelsea, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Brent can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Brent is $850/month compared to $756/month in Chelsea — a 12% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Chelsea is more affordable at $101,300 median vs $188,000.

Median household income in Brent is $78,068 compared to $42,875 in Chelsea (+82.1%). While Brent is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Brent spend roughly 13.1% of their income on rent, less than the 21.2% in Chelsea.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Brent
71
Chelsea
63
12% cheaper
Median Household Income
Brent
$78,068
45% higher
Chelsea
$42,875

Housing

Median Rent
Brent
$850
Chelsea
$756
11% cheaper
Median Home Value
Brent
$188,000
Chelsea
$101,300
46% cheaper
Population
Brent
633
Chelsea
1,862

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula:

Everyday Prices

BLS Average Prices by metro area

Gasoline (regular)
Brent $2.86
Chelsea $2.86
US $3.07
🥚
Eggs (grade A, large)
Brent $2.33
Chelsea $2.33
US $2.50
🥛
Milk (whole)
Brent $3.75
Chelsea $3.76
US $4.03
🍞
Bread (white)
Brent $1.72
Chelsea $1.73
US $1.85
🍗
Chicken breast
Brent $3.86
Chelsea $3.87
US $4.14
Electricity
Brent $0.15
Chelsea $0.15
US $0.19