Home / Compare / Big Timber vs Shelby

Big Timber, MT vs Shelby, MT

82
Big Timber
Montana
VS
+13.3%
73
Shelby
Montana

Shelby is moderately more affordable than Big Timber, with a 13.3% lower cost of living index. Big Timber scores 82 compared to 73 for Shelby, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Big Timber can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Big Timber is $1,009/month compared to $769/month in Shelby — a 31% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Shelby is more affordable at $206,000 median vs $235,100.

Median household income in Big Timber is $63,514 compared to $53,357 in Shelby (+19%). While Big Timber is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Big Timber spend roughly 19.1% of their income on rent, more than the 17.3% in Shelby.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Big Timber
82
Shelby
73
12% cheaper
Median Household Income
Big Timber
$63,514
16% higher
Shelby
$53,357

Housing

Median Rent
Big Timber
$1,009
Shelby
$769
24% cheaper
Median Home Value
Big Timber
$235,100
Shelby
$206,000
12% cheaper
Population
Big Timber
1,530
Shelby
3,129

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula: