Home / Compare / Big Timber vs Hot Springs

Big Timber, MT vs Hot Springs, MT

82
Big Timber
Montana
VS
+27.4%
65
Hot Springs
Montana

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Hot Springs is 27.4% cheaper than Big Timber. With a cost index of 65 vs 82, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Hot Springs to Big Timber should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Big Timber is $1,009/month compared to $683/month in Hot Springs — a 48% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Hot Springs is more affordable at $139,100 median vs $235,100.

Median household income in Big Timber is $63,514 compared to $21,319 in Hot Springs (+197.9%). While Big Timber is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Big Timber spend roughly 19.1% of their income on rent, less than the 38.4% in Hot Springs. The Big Timber ratio exceeds the commonly recommended 30% threshold, which can put pressure on household budgets.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Big Timber
82
Hot Springs
65
22% cheaper
Median Household Income
Big Timber
$63,514
66% higher
Hot Springs
$21,319

Housing

Median Rent
Big Timber
$1,009
Hot Springs
$683
32% cheaper
Median Home Value
Big Timber
$235,100
Hot Springs
$139,100
41% cheaper
Population
Big Timber
1,530
Hot Springs
558

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula: