Beaver, UT vs Woodland Hills, UT

The cost of living difference between Beaver, UT and Woodland Hills, UT is dramatic. Beaver is 37.9% cheaper than Woodland Hills, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Beaver has a cost index of 91 while Woodland Hills sits at 147, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Beaver is $1,101/month compared to $1,750/month in Woodland Hills — a 37% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Beaver is more affordable at $295,700 median vs $736,100.

Median household income in Beaver is $82,625 compared to $137,426 in Woodland Hills (-39.9%). While Woodland Hills is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Beaver spend roughly 16% of their income on rent, more than the 15.3% in Woodland Hills.