Beaver, OK vs Earlsboro, OK

Beaver is moderately more affordable than Earlsboro, with a 10% lower cost of living index. Beaver scores 65 compared to 72 for Earlsboro, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Earlsboro can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Beaver is $767/month compared to $883/month in Earlsboro — a 13% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Beaver is more affordable at $123,500 median vs $168,400.

Median household income in Beaver is $53,500 compared to $66,827 in Earlsboro (-19.9%). While Earlsboro is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Beaver spend roughly 17.2% of their income on rent, more than the 15.9% in Earlsboro.