Bearden, AR vs Eureka Springs, AR

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Bearden is 29.6% cheaper than Eureka Springs. With a cost index of 55 vs 78, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Bearden to Eureka Springs should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Bearden is $579/month compared to $845/month in Eureka Springs — a 32% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Bearden is more affordable at $76,100 median vs $246,900.

Median household income in Bearden is $28,143 compared to $41,821 in Eureka Springs (-32.7%). While Eureka Springs is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Bearden spend roughly 24.7% of their income on rent, more than the 24.2% in Eureka Springs.