Batesville, AR vs Mena, AR

Mena is moderately more affordable than Batesville, with a 10.9% lower cost of living index. Batesville scores 69 compared to 62 for Mena, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Batesville can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Batesville is $821/month compared to $720/month in Mena — a 14% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Mena is more affordable at $114,200 median vs $159,200.

Median household income in Batesville is $54,424 compared to $50,875 in Mena (+7%). The higher salaries in Batesville partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Batesville spend roughly 18.1% of their income on rent, more than the 17% in Mena.