Home / Compare / Batavia vs Eureka

Batavia, MT vs Eureka, MT

93
Batavia
Montana
VS
+20.1%
77
Eureka
Montana

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Eureka is 20.1% cheaper than Batavia. With a cost index of 77 vs 93, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Eureka to Batavia should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Batavia is $1,152/month compared to $1,012/month in Eureka — a 14% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Eureka is more affordable at $172,300 median vs $310,000.

Median household income in Batavia is $61,346 compared to $43,750 in Eureka (+40.2%). While Batavia is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Batavia spend roughly 22.5% of their income on rent, less than the 27.8% in Eureka.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Batavia
93
Eureka
77
17% cheaper
Median Household Income
Batavia
$61,346
29% higher
Eureka
$43,750

Housing

Median Rent
Batavia
$1,152
Eureka
$1,012
12% cheaper
Median Home Value
Batavia
$310,000
Eureka
$172,300
44% cheaper
Population
Batavia
740
Eureka
2,009

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula: