Home / Compare / Baggs vs Ranchester

Baggs, WY vs Ranchester, WY

68
Baggs
Wyoming
VS
-14.4%
80
Ranchester
Wyoming

Baggs is moderately more affordable than Ranchester, with a 14.4% lower cost of living index. Baggs scores 68 compared to 80 for Ranchester, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Ranchester can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Baggs is $698/month compared to $765/month in Ranchester — a 9% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Baggs is more affordable at $180,800 median vs $295,900.

Median household income in Baggs is $54,063 compared to $65,568 in Ranchester (-17.5%). While Ranchester is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Baggs spend roughly 15.5% of their income on rent, more than the 14% in Ranchester.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Baggs
68
14% cheaper
Ranchester
80
Median Household Income
Baggs
$54,063
Ranchester
$65,568
18% higher

Housing

Median Rent
Baggs
$698
9% cheaper
Ranchester
$765
Median Home Value
Baggs
$180,800
39% cheaper
Ranchester
$295,900
Population
Baggs
411
Ranchester
1,069

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula: