Home / Compare / Baggs vs Moorcroft

Baggs, WY vs Moorcroft, WY

68
Baggs
Wyoming
VS
-16.8%
82
Moorcroft
Wyoming

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Baggs is 16.8% cheaper than Moorcroft. With a cost index of 68 vs 82, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Baggs to Moorcroft should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Baggs is $698/month compared to $1,025/month in Moorcroft — a 32% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Baggs is more affordable at $180,800 median vs $227,900.

Median household income in Baggs is $54,063 compared to $66,176 in Moorcroft (-18.3%). While Moorcroft is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Baggs spend roughly 15.5% of their income on rent, less than the 18.6% in Moorcroft.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Baggs
68
17% cheaper
Moorcroft
82
Median Household Income
Baggs
$54,063
Moorcroft
$66,176
18% higher

Housing

Median Rent
Baggs
$698
32% cheaper
Moorcroft
$1,025
Median Home Value
Baggs
$180,800
21% cheaper
Moorcroft
$227,900
Population
Baggs
411
Moorcroft
1,062

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula: