Aurora, UT vs Sterling, UT

Aurora, UT and Sterling, UT have a very similar cost of living, with only a 1.4% difference in their overall index. Aurora scores 82 while Sterling scores 81 on the cost of living index, where 100 represents the national average. The day-to-day expenses for residents in both cities are comparable, though differences emerge when looking at specific categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Aurora is $850/month compared to $950/month in Sterling — a 11% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Aurora has cheaper rent, Sterling actually has lower median home values ($221,900 vs $272,600).

Median household income in Aurora is $92,321 compared to $64,261 in Sterling (+43.7%). While Aurora is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Aurora spend roughly 11% of their income on rent, less than the 17.7% in Sterling.