Aurora, MN vs Redwood Falls, MN
There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Aurora is 27.6% cheaper than Redwood Falls. With a cost index of 52 vs 72, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Aurora to Redwood Falls should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.
On the housing front, median rent in Aurora is $471/month compared to $824/month in Redwood Falls — a 43% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Aurora is more affordable at $88,700 median vs $162,000.
Median household income in Aurora is $42,406 compared to $61,947 in Redwood Falls (-31.5%). While Redwood Falls is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Aurora spend roughly 13.3% of their income on rent, less than the 16% in Redwood Falls.
Income & Cost
Housing
Salary Equivalency Calculator
What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?
Everyday Prices
BLS Average Prices by metro area