Auburn, IN vs Clinton, IN

Clinton is moderately more affordable than Auburn, with a 11.9% lower cost of living index. Auburn scores 71 compared to 63 for Clinton, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Auburn can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Auburn is $831/month compared to $806/month in Clinton — a 3% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Clinton is more affordable at $96,800 median vs $172,800.

Median household income in Auburn is $62,339 compared to $43,374 in Clinton (+43.7%). While Auburn is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Auburn spend roughly 16% of their income on rent, less than the 22.3% in Clinton.