Atoka, OK vs Clinton, OK

Atoka is moderately more affordable than Clinton, with a 12.7% lower cost of living index. Atoka scores 59 compared to 67 for Clinton, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Clinton can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Atoka is $604/month compared to $888/month in Clinton — a 32% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Atoka has cheaper rent, Clinton actually has lower median home values ($112,500 vs $112,800).

Median household income in Atoka is $42,169 compared to $58,417 in Clinton (-27.8%). While Clinton is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Atoka spend roughly 17.2% of their income on rent, less than the 18.2% in Clinton.