Home / Compare / Ackerman vs Crenshaw

Ackerman, MS vs Crenshaw, MS

62
Ackerman
Mississippi
VS
-1.6%
63
Crenshaw
Mississippi

Ackerman, MS and Crenshaw, MS have a very similar cost of living, with only a 1.6% difference in their overall index. Ackerman scores 62 while Crenshaw scores 63 on the cost of living index, where 100 represents the national average. The day-to-day expenses for residents in both cities are comparable, though differences emerge when looking at specific categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Ackerman is $658/month compared to $824/month in Crenshaw — a 20% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Ackerman has cheaper rent, Crenshaw actually has lower median home values ($81,900 vs $131,000).

Median household income in Ackerman is $47,917 compared to $36,542 in Crenshaw (+31.1%). Ackerman offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Ackerman spend roughly 16.5% of their income on rent, less than the 27.1% in Crenshaw.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (64°F vs 63.4°F). Crenshaw receives more rainfall at 54.9" per year compared to 51.8" in Ackerman.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Ackerman
62
2% cheaper
Crenshaw
63
Median Household Income
Ackerman
$47,917
24% higher
Crenshaw
$36,542

Housing

Median Rent
Ackerman
$658
20% cheaper
Crenshaw
$824
Median Home Value
Ackerman
$131,000
Crenshaw
$81,900
37% cheaper
Population
Ackerman
1,906
Crenshaw
675

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula:

Climate

NOAA 30-year normals (1991-2020)

Avg Temp
Ackerman 64°F
Crenshaw 63.4°F
Summer High
Ackerman 92°F
Crenshaw 92°F
Winter Low
Ackerman 35°F
Crenshaw 33°F
Rainfall
Ackerman 51.8"
Crenshaw 54.9"
Rainy Days
Ackerman 107d
Crenshaw 111d