Aberdeen, MS vs Clarksdale, MS

Aberdeen is moderately more affordable than Clarksdale, with a 6.4% lower cost of living index. Aberdeen scores 58 compared to 62 for Clarksdale, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Clarksdale can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Aberdeen is $633/month compared to $762/month in Clarksdale — a 17% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Aberdeen is more affordable at $84,100 median vs $84,200.

Median household income in Aberdeen is $40,732 compared to $35,210 in Clarksdale (+15.7%). Aberdeen offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Aberdeen spend roughly 18.6% of their income on rent, less than the 26% in Clarksdale.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (63.6°F vs 64°F). Aberdeen receives more rainfall at 57.7" per year compared to 49" in Clarksdale.