Aberdeen, MD vs Clinton, MD

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Aberdeen is 20.8% cheaper than Clinton. With a cost index of 96 vs 122, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Aberdeen to Clinton should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Aberdeen is $1,339/month compared to $1,665/month in Clinton — a 20% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Aberdeen is more affordable at $239,000 median vs $400,300.

Median household income in Aberdeen is $76,019 compared to $120,967 in Clinton (-37.2%). While Clinton is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Aberdeen spend roughly 21.1% of their income on rent, more than the 16.5% in Clinton.

Climate-wise, Clinton is notably warmer with an average of 59.3°F compared to 55.2°F in Aberdeen. Aberdeen receives more rainfall at 47.1" per year compared to 41.8" in Clinton.