Aetna Estates, CO vs Fort Garland, CO

Fort Garland is moderately more affordable than Aetna Estates, with a 6.6% lower cost of living index. Aetna Estates scores 87 compared to 82 for Fort Garland, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Aetna Estates can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Aetna Estates is $1,490/month compared to $871/month in Fort Garland — a 71% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Fort Garland has cheaper rent, Aetna Estates actually has lower median home values ($58,200 vs $239,600).

Median household income in Aetna Estates is $63,887 compared to $29,750 in Fort Garland (+114.7%). While Aetna Estates is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Aetna Estates spend roughly 28% of their income on rent, less than the 35.1% in Fort Garland. The Aetna Estates ratio exceeds the commonly recommended 30% threshold, which can put pressure on household budgets.